ORDER MY NEW BOOK HERE
“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.” ― Nikola Tesla
The more I study the scientism of a spinning globe earth, the more insane it becomes. Continuing on from the last two blogs, I want to explore further the relationship between centrifugal force, the theory of gravity and the idea of a spinning ball earth.
I don’t want you falling asleep trying to read this so I am going to be as succinct as possible with the hope that you the reader will do your own research. As I said in my last post, the scientific community has had 500 years to weave their tapestry of a heliocentric model. It started with a theory and then equations were created to support the theory.
But if you can think clearly, you will discover flaw after flaw with the heliocentric, infinite cosmos concept. Case in point – centrifugal force and how it must work on a spinning ball earth.
We are told that the earth’s rotation is spinning at a velocity of 1,040 mph at the equator, which is 0° latitude. The distance around the globe at that latitude is alleged to be 24, 901 miles. (Assuming a perfect spheroid which we are told the earth is not; it’s oblate. But it is irrelevant to the point.) If you were in Minneapolis, MN, you would be standing just a couple of degrees below the 45th parallel, or 45° N latitude, which is halfway between the equator and the north pole. So for this discussion we’ll pretend that it is at 45° latitude. The circumference around the earth at 45° latitude (north or south) is supposed to be 17,637 miles and the speed of the rotation at that latitude would be 735.67 mph. That’s right, the rotation is moving slower the farther away from the equator you go because the distance of the latitude circumference is shorter. If you were to stand exactly at the north pole dead center, you would barely be moving if the earth looked something like the picture below..
Now, picture yourself on one of those merry-go-rounds that we used to play on in the park. We would grab those rails and start running until we couldn’t run any faster and then we would jump on. Remember how hard it was to hang on the faster it went? Imagine how hard it would be to hold on if it was going around at 1,040 mph. Ok, keep this in your mind.
Here is where you must think clearly!
This is the formula for centrifugal force: Fc = mv2/r which is mass x (velocity squared) divided by the radius.
A 200 lb. man standing at the equator would supposedly experience gravity holding him on the earth while it spins at 1,040 mph. If you plug 200 into the equation as M, or mass, the man’s true weight would be 54,784 lbs. (54,584 + 200). V=1040 mph and r= 3963 miles. So 200 (mass) x 1,081,600 (velocity of 1040 squared) = 216,320,000. 216,320,000 divided by the radius of 3963 = 54,584. 54,584 is the outward pulling force but because of gravity, his scale weight is 200.
But what must happen to that man’s experience as he travels away from the equator? As he travels north to Minneapolis, the velocity of the spin would become slower and slower. Therefore, the centrifugal force would decrease. However, gravity would remain constant. By the time that man reached Minneapolis, the centrifugal force would become 38,560 (r=2807.1 miles and v=735.67 mph) and his effective weight or scale weight would become 15,720 lbs. (54,280 – 38,560)! And if he were to go and stand on the north pole dead center, his scale weight would be 54,280 lbs. because there would be no centrifugal force!
No one could survive those changes. The human body would be crushed under it’s own weight. But it doesn’t happen. Why not? Well, the only way it could NOT happen on a spinning ball earth is if gravity adjusted itself to the velocity of latitude. However, that cannot happen because gravity, we are told, is relative to mass not velocity. The effect of centrifugal force in countering gravity has led it sometimes to be called “false gravity” or “imitation gravity” or “quasi-gravity”. But gravity is not intelligent, it can’t know where you are on the globe to adjust itself.
It’s a very big problem for the globe earth model isn’t it? Interestingly, Isaac Newton knew it was a problem. So you know what he did? He came up with a novel new force called Centripetal Force. This is where things really get in the weeds and the ‘deep thinking’ starts to occur. You can go here and read the history of centrifugal and centripetal force. If you have your eyes open, you will begin to see how equations and formulas are constructed based on a premise of ‘planetary motion’. It is a philosophical exercise that attempts to create a scientific proof, if you will. In other words, they have to come up with something to support the premise of a spinning and orbiting earth and to overcome any flaws with the theory.
Believe it or not, deep thinking can produce seemingly genius equations that have no basis in reality. This is what Tesla was getting at.
So what is Centripetal Force? It’s a figment of someone’s imagination, in my opinion. What it is supposed to be is an equal but opposite force to centrifugal force. In fact, scientism says that centrifugal force actually does not exist, but centripetal force does. That’s right, centrifugal force is fictitious, imaginary. Here is a link from the University of Virginia as an illustrative reference. It is truly bizarre. Here is a direct quote:
• An object traveling in a circle behaves as if it is experiencing an outward force. This force, known as the centrifugal force, depends on the mass of the object, the speed of rotation, and the distance from the center. The more massive the object, the greater the force; the greater the speed of the object, the greater the force; and the greater the distance from the center, the greater the force.
“It is important to note that the centrifugal force does not actually exist. We feel it, because we are in a non-inertial coordinate system. Nevertheless, it appears quite real to the object being rotated. This is because the object believes that it is in a non-accelerating situation, when in fact it is not. For instance, a child on a merry-go-round is not experiencing any real force outward, but he/she must exert a force to keep from flying off the merry-go-round. Because the centrifugal force appears so real, it is often very useful to use as if it were real. The more massive the object, the greater the force. We know that this is true because an adult will have a harder time staying on a merry-go-round than a child will. The greater the speed of rotation, the greater the outward force. We know that this is true because a merry-go-round is harder to stay on, the faster it rotates. If you move further out on the merry-go-round, you will have to exert a greater force to stay on. In order to stay on a circular path, we must exert a force towards the center called centripetal (or “center-seeking”) force. Consider a rope with a ball on the end. You can swirl the ball around in a circle over your head while holding onto the rope. The ball experiences the so-called centrifugal force, and it is the rope that provides the force to keep in moving in the circle.”
Now, I don’t mean to say that some force exists naturally that is experienced when you start going in circles. Centrifugal force is created when something moves in a circle and ultimately it is just velocity. But reality says that when you are going in a circle, you are thrown away from the center. Science says that centripetal force is a real force that keeps something going in the circle at a constant distance and speed. But all of the examples given to prove this theory are based on something being ‘tethered’ to the center of the spinning object and that is not what we are debating here – something being tethered, that is. And do not be confused, centripetal force is NOT gravity. In fact, the formula for centripetal force is the same as centrifugal!
Folks, this is just techno-babble. Do your own research. On a spinning earth, if you weigh 200 lbs. in Minneapolis, then you would only weigh 2.54 lbs. on the equator. So evidently all you have to do to lose weight is head south.
By the way…THAT’S 30 LBS. LESS THAN HE WOULD WEIGH ON THE MOON! That is of course if anyone could actually stand on the moon and the moon had gravity.
Mucho gracias to Rob Cookson, owner of flatearthbible.com for all of his input.
Dan Baker
You must be logged in to post a comment.